Click to join POSSAnti-missiletornadopowersource
Possible renewable resource powersource and/or
possible anti-missile/tornado concepts
http://informexp.com/Powersource.htm
(the below is slightly modified)
Intuitively, we can expect the most efficient shape
for induction
(electricity – voltage - created by a Conductor
moving in a magnetic field) http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=conductor+moving+magnetic+field+voltage&ei=UTF-8&fr=ush1-mail&vm=r&x=wrt&u=library.thinkquest.org/C001429/electricity/electricity24.htm&w=conductor+moving+magnetic+field+fields+voltage&d=bO_KxRIeORxC&icp=1&.intl=us
WE
A
which can be found
in the following link: http://www.magnummagnetics.com/magnetic_sheeting.htm
http://composite.about.com/library/glossary/e/bldef-e1908.htm?terms=permanent+magnet
“Polymeric
materials which have been electrically polarized so that one side has a
positive charge and the other side a negative charge, much like permanent
magnets.”
The most efficient shape of our cone would be at
about a 45 degree angle with a
hole at the top and bottom in the center. The least expensive, least oxidizing
conductors with least the resistance would be alloy of copper and silver
http://www.chemicool.com/
To utilize the concept
of getting the electrons (voltage) to pass in the middle to avoid skin effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect
http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Workshop/advice/coils/power_loss.html
“current flow moves away
from those regions of the conductor having the strongest magnetic field… skin
effect produces a decrease in inductance”
(partly to avoid creating
excessive heat in larger wires) of a smaller wire conductor, similar to stranded or Wigner wire http://focus.aps.org/story/v8/st22
electrons form an ideal classical Drude conductor
http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?p=Drude+conductor&ei=UTF-8&fr=ush1-mail&vm=r&x=wrt&u=people.deas.harvard.edu/%7Ejones/es154/lectures/lecture_2/drude_model/drude_model.html&w=drude+conductor+conductors&d=SaAbm_mdOeCD&icp=1&.intl=us
Drude model - powerful model electrical conductivity by not
having a perfectly rounded surface, we create balls from conductive foil of
various conductors and dielectrics to create a conductor that partly act as a
capacitor or dielectric. We want a least likely to melt, least toxic and the
most durable conductive foil shaped into various sizes (filled with powdered
metal of the same metal alloys), and/or also Pyroelectric
crystals and electrets; The mix of resin with honey (a dense molecule similar
to resin), nano bismuth, Nano
zinc oxide, (and perhaps Pyroelectric crystals) is
then layered the metal foil conductor is then wrapped into balls placed in various sizes divided by various cages putting the balls that are largest in the areas where the magnetism is the greatest. (This might
suggest adding aluminum or titanium into the alloy; Low electrical
conductivity- (approx 3% of copper; Titanium fires exist!)
http://www.lycos.com/info/capacitor--dielectric.html
http://www.mitsui-kinzoku.co.jp/project/kinoufun/en/bifun/bifun.html
Or put crystals within the balled foil? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity
http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/py/pyroelectric_crystal.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resin
Mix resin with honey for the Dielectric in the
balls?
Resin compares to sugar molecule, which is similar
to honey
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey
Honey doesn't spoil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamagnetic
“Materials that are said to be diamagnetic are
those which are usually considered by non-physicists as "non
magnetic", and include water,
most organic compounds such as oil and plastic, and
many metals such as mercury, gold and bismuth” We will use
a Faraday cage to separate the sizes so as to place the largest sizes of
balls where the magnetic field would be the most dense. Perhaps create
the Faraday cage out of springs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
http://www.polymet.com/springs.htm
input form might not have worked.
Outside the Faraday cage would be a concave mirror
to focus reflected light where the magnetic field would be most dense.
A light wind foil, turbine, is needed to be perhaps
put on the top and bottom to circulate air into the faraday cage; durable
conductive material (similar to solar panels), this could be the new
type of triple layer photoelectric cells to capture different photons of
various light in the light spectrum and make into various spiral or IRIS (see
next paragraph) type wind capture formations that funnel electrons to
the more central device and more metallic conductors. Wind capture could be
shaped similar to an IRIS with style (flexible), umbrella (half moon shape
pointing down TO BRING
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flower
umbrella and stigma.
(Should the petals be specially sprayed to capture
different bandwidths closer to the center of the petals as photoelectric cells
or be layered or sprayed as layers? (Would this increase the efficiency beyond
30 %?)
(Bottom petals might not be needed)
http://www.daystartech.com/lightfoil.cfm
Nanosolar SolarPly?
http://www.nanosolar.com/products.htm
I do not like iodine in lightfoil.
Aluminum foil-gallium indium phosphide?
Can something else be used? Could it be sprayed in
layers to pick up?
(HIGH band-gap
energy-ULTRAVIOLET TO
http://www.sumitomocanada.com/opencms/opencms/ssca/montreal/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Renewable_Energy_Laboratory
PRMECA-07-CA-002-CAUCASUS-03-26-07
INCLUDING an
More specially ENGINEERING
needed below:
1) DO SPECIALLY MADE
NEED TO BE MADE (PLASTIC MAGNETS MIGHT MELT);
2) PERHAPS A SPECIALLY MADE SOLAR
THE
3) PERHAPS A SPECIALLY MADE CONDUCTIVE METAL ALSO
SHAPED INTO VARIOUS SIZED SPRINGS FOR THE FARADAY CAGE
4) SPECIAL MIRROR OR REFLEXTIVE CONCAVE SURFACE TO
REFLECT LIGHT
5) THEN INNOVATIONS IN THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS!
(It might be somewhat easy to contain the balls
within springs by putting them in cloth and pulling the cloth out of
the springs when they are tied together around the balls).
6)
7)
COMPLEX BUT
ORIGINAL. THIS IS ABOUT THE MOST EFFICIENT DESIGN.
THEN THERE
THE COMMON BELIEF IS THE
$25 million to reduce Carbon dioxide from atmosphere could be
mostly backed by
pro-nuclear power types.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lovelock
James LOVELOCK site is hosted
ecolo.org hosted by Environmentalists For Nuclear
Energy (might not have a change with him for my ideas!)
Lovelock is currently president of
the Marine Biological Association (MBA),
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen
Dr. James Hansen heads the NASA
Institute for Space Studies[1] in
http://search.nasa.gov/about/contact/index.html
http://www.theweathermakers.com/about/ Tim Flannery author
feedback@current.tv
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore president
THERE
Wrap coil opposite direction of
the wind flow of a tornado and place to defuse tornado activity because the
atmosphere is paramagnetic (consists of paramagnetic oxygen and diamagnetic
nitrogen).
http://www20.brinkster.com/tstscorpion/tornadosolution/index.htm
8 POSSIBLE
DELUSIONAL IDEAS OF HIS? YOUR THOUGHTS?
Method and apparatus for
Protecting against Tornadoes;
1. Suspect True , BUT HE
2. Suspect false and seems like
stupid rocket fascination: "reducing the strength of the electric field
that arising between the storm cloud and the ground by the application of
short? circuit electrodes via balloons
or rockets"
3. Seriously doubt the following
rather suspect friction and moisture content: "Precipitation
of rain and hail are the main source of the rise of large the electric
differences potential between storm cloud and ground."
4. UNLIKELY
5. MORE IMPORTANTLY, IT IS LIKELY
ONLY A SOURCE OF FRICTION: The jet stream itself may
be also a source of large positive electric charge.
6.
7. FALSE? TORNADOS (A WIRL AROUND A LIGHTNING STRIKE SIMILAR TO THE WIRL
AROUND VOLTAGE,
8. THE FOLLOWING SEEMS
LIKELY SILLY FANTASY (" For best results, this metal
wire is wound into a coil")
9. HE WILL LIKELY
ELECTROCUTE FISH IN THE WATER
So grounding to water source might
electrocute fish. No mention of paramagnetic, friction. First, the ground or
grounding of a circuit is a misnomer. For most purposes the term means earthing or connecting the circuit to earth. In actuality,
it's connecting the circuit to a common point of reference; for most systems
that is the earth.
There are also a number of
misconceptions that affect how a ground system works. The following facts are
generally not known or are misunderstood. The earth is NOT always a good
ground.
*@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.* *@*.*